A few weeks ago my local newspaper published a piece on Lifelong Learning that expressed concerns about the lack of support the Dutch Government is giving to it. The argument is that there are good intentions, but action is missing. “No one is against Lifelong Learning, but we need more people promoting it actively”, according to Theo Bovens of the Dutch Open University. His institute is facing a decrease in new students year after year. You can argue if this is an indication of a lack of interest in lifelong learning or it is pointing at a different problem.
But anyway, more concerns are raised. The article points at the fact that it is not possible in the Netherlands to get a Government sponsored scholarship for picking up a study beyond your thirties. Also the cancellation of attractive tax deductions and the limiting of subsidies is doing Lifelong Learning no good according to the journalist. The government should take its responsibility in financing Lifelong Learning instead of leaving it to organizations and individual employees. In my opinion the government is already betting on a new horse called Innovation. The article continues with the scary perspective that this behavior will lead us to disaster. The Netherlands will not reach their goal of having 20% of the workforce following a part-time course or studying besides work . Is this alarming? Well, when you look at the fact that the Netherlands are at 16.6% and above average in the EU, there is nothing to worry about. But when you consider the Netherlands having knowledge economy and innovation high on its priority list, it might be alarming that Slovenia has passed us and also Sweden and Finland score significantly higher.
But there is hope. Research into Lifelong Learning is in general only focused on formal education (Education Permanente). It is about quantity in money spend on and students that go through education and training programs. Although it provides some information on the bias for learning in a country, there is much more than just the formal side of learning. Lifelong learning is as human as eating and sleeping. It is a natural thing, that occurs regardless of classrooms and instructors (in some cases even more effective in the absence of these). Especially in times of rapid change in knowledge, technology and methodologies formal approaches are too slow anyway. So, let us be the best in informal learning. It won’t help us make us reach our Lisbon goals, but it will help us forward.
Vote for this article or add it to:


3 responses so far ↓
1 Daan // Aug 20, 2007 at 11:32 pm
Maybe the 15 lessons to cultivate Lifelong Learning can help out here:
http://www.lifehack.org/articles/lifestyle/15-steps-to-cultivate-lifelong-learning.html
2 Vincent // Aug 21, 2007 at 2:44 pm
Off course, the Open University will always make the statement that we do not invest enough in lifelong learning. They are dependent on the incomes from ´second chance´ education. But when I look from the corporate perspective, we invent a lot of money into formal training and development. Interestingly, only formal learning is valued as life longlearning. But, about 90% of our learning experiences comes from informal learning.
So, targets as 20% of the workforce should follow a part-time course make no sense. The government should not invest in life long learning, that will be regulated by the market. But invest in primary, secondary and higher education. The core business of the government.
3 Nederlander steeds hoger opgeleid, en dan? | Atrivision weblog // Dec 17, 2007 at 2:50 pm
[…] nog niet voldoende is doorgedrongen in Nederland. Hieraan gerelateerd is het stagneren van lifelong learning door het gebrek aan aandacht van overheid en onderwijs voor het vervolg op formeel onderwijs. Het […]
Leave a Comment